![solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wXW43IXdgpI/maxresdefault.jpg)
- #SOLIDTHINKING INSPIRE SURFACE WITH ZERO THICKNESS MAC OS X#
- #SOLIDTHINKING INSPIRE SURFACE WITH ZERO THICKNESS SOFTWARE#
#SOLIDTHINKING INSPIRE SURFACE WITH ZERO THICKNESS MAC OS X#
Note that Inspire is available in both PC Windows and Mac OS X versions, making it less of a headache when it comes to managing IT ecosystems.ģD printing is not a recent development, but now is quickly becoming a staple within the design process. To explore formal variations, for example, I trace the parts I want to optimize, and then add material descriptors, loads, and constraints.
![solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness](https://develop3d.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/SolidThinking_Inspire_FW_img_1.png)
This is called its "Design Space," within which we can perform formal explorations. The caveats relating to functional inadequacies of interoperability are, however, usually hidden or - worse still - discovered at an inopportune stage of design development.įrom this perspective, Inspire is very straight-forward: it accepts 3D solid objects created in the popular industry-standard formats, because it needs only the 3D volume of the model.
#SOLIDTHINKING INSPIRE SURFACE WITH ZERO THICKNESS SOFTWARE#
Software makers realize that in their fragmented market, everyone has to play nice. With MCAD applications increasingly converging in terms of features and target industries, interoperability is a term widely abused by marketing. Rather than using the UI as a technical layer between the designer and the idea, Inspire's interface is an extension of the designer's thought framework. The only other interface where I have seen such thoughtful design is in games, navigation software, and Web and phone apps. For users more familiar with traditional MCAD applications, this is simply mind-blowing (see figure 3).įigure 3: The simple UI of Inspire the inset shows how tools are grouped around a common theme, and are visible only on mouse hover It's not necessarily innovative, but solidThinking had the idea of creating an interface with just four menus, along with tools that are hierarchically bunched together on an uncluttered screen. It does this by making it easy to move models in and out of the software, and by making it easy to create geometry within the application. One of the ways that Inspire eases translation costs is by shortening the learning curve. The point here is that every change in format requires translation and the accompanying loss of data.
![solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m-StfBMbGqU/maxresdefault.jpg)
Ultimately, I need to record the designs in a more widely used format for analysis, be it spatial, structural, or thermal. As a designer myself, my first instinct is to confirm the design's viability as quickly as possible on paper, or the software of my choice. Designers like to use paper, and sometimes even easy-to-use software for quickly exploring forms and ideas. The hidden cost here is that of translation. Most software developers design this kind of UI, unfortunately, and the result is a long learning curve and lost productivity. I often find myself drowning in icons, sub-menus, and the ribbon's split buttons. The toughest challenge when working with a UI (user interface) in engineering design software is to find the location of all its tools. Inspire enhances the design process in three ways: (a) through the user interface, (b) by its ability to work with generic and industry-standard data formats, and (c) with its fast, powerful optimization process. Although it is hard to supplant the immediacy of pencil-on-paper for formal explorations, subsequent iterations occur mostly in software for easier repetition and communication.
![solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness solidthinking inspire surface with zero thickness](https://www.digitalengineering247.com/article/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/figure_8_load_cases.jpg)
It is no wonder many designers prefer to perform their initial studies on paper. In an age when pinch-to-zoom and voice interaction blurs human-to-machine interaction, the user interface of most design software is still firmly limited by dialog boxes and software frameworks developed and used by a previous generation of software frameworks. Figure 2: Inspire expanding the design exploration phase to include later stages (indicated by red dotted lines) and reduce the number of design iterationsįluidity is not a term used generously in the design process when describing the contribution of MCAD software, and there are good reasons for this: the steep learning curve of traditional MCAD software, its cost, and the difficulty of such software to communicate with proprietary data formats (i.e., translation errors).